The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise appearances before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on prohibited gaming.

No, they weren't personally in participation, but the world-famous celebrities were conspicuously consisted of in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the questionable websites using both complimentary casino-style video games and rewarding prizes, such as money, present cards or cryptocurrency. In one advertisement, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'play for totally free,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.

The websites are simply two cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now discovers itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of lots of video gaming corporations, not to point out suit complainants and state regulators, sweepstakes casinos act as conventional casinos, only without the oversight, consumer securities and tax laws. So not only can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal sports betting levy, but sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative difficulties like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming protections.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the business faces allegations of prohibited gambling in a New york city suit that claims VGW utilizes celeb endorsers to 'develop a veneer of authenticity' around its item. (See VGW's statement listed below)

'I'm uncertain" if you don't trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business running multibillion-dollar unlawful operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, informed DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers consist of a variety of celebrities from sports betting enthusiasts Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, as well as NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom use any differences between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among many sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest prompts fans to play at Chumba Casino, where numerous - however not all - video games are complimentary

Drake has a handle social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to call NBA group owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements usually center around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for real gambling losses.

Others tempt customers with promises of prizes. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks advertisement showing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates before pivoting to video of the rapper playing online casino-style video games.

'Daddy, why do we have a lot money?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption explained: 'Because I never quit.'

The discrepancy between gambling sites and social or sweepstakes gambling establishments is a bit intricate, but operators of the latter insist they're not included with the former.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), explained its members are not in direct competitors with online casinos and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, the majority of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for free.

'Most social sweeps clients never ever make a purchase,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'The minority of consumers who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller sized than the normal deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos provide consumers an opportunity to play casino-style games with friends. Players have the option to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine money, but can be utilized to unlock numerous features within the video games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes video gaming, allowing consumers to acquire other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for money or other prizes.

And therein lies the capacity for monetary losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York City. One gamer informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the past year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Global Poker occasion

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement revealing off Drake's automobiles, airplanes and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are prohibited in all but seven states, which has actually assisted to sustain the popularity of sweepstakes casinos.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes sites, which don't require typically need identification. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from players trying to withdraw any funds.

Many websites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, enable customers to send mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, supplied the gamers follow painfully particular directions. What's more, players are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins just for signing up, therefore providing a reason to attempt their hands at any number of gambling establishment video games for a possibility to win - or lose - genuine money.

So why are sweepstakes sites permitted to operate in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their product is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competitors is just a method of promoting their support.

'Social sweepstakes video games are simply a kind of online entertainment,' an SPGA representative told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is required to dip into social casinos with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for a chance to win prizes. That lack of a purchase requirement - or" factor to consider" - is a vital difference in between social sweeps and traditional online sports betting sites like casinos.'

Consider the manner in which McDonald's utilizes its yearly Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to gamble, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that provide them the chance to win rewarding prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'consideration', the video game itself does not meet the meaning of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are an enduring method for promoting all type of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA spokesperson informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are frequently utilized by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to numerous gambling industry insiders, that argument does not cut it.

For starters, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach mentions, McDonald's Monopoly game does not run forever. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thus recommending the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They do not last forever and they're generally not connected to casino-style games of possibility,' Wallach told DailyMail.com. 'They're just cash giveaways.

'The sweepstakes [casinos] possess none of the attributes typically associated with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes casinos use" casino-like" payments, typically 80 percent or more of profits, whereas the common payment percentage for a momentary advertising sweepstakes is an insignificant share of the revenue made by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to compare the online social sweeps casinos to the internet cafes that sprang up in Florida, using clients the possibility to play casino-style games for real rewards. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have given that been shuttered over claims of illegal gambling.

DJ Khaled is amongst a number of celeb spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name

Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments ought to deal with comparable scrutiny.

'These distinctions are not approximate,' Wallach said of social sweeps casinos. 'They have repeatedly been pointed out by courts and state lawyer generals as key elements in identifying that a sweepstakes promotion remained in truth a guise for unlawful sports betting.'

Among the casino market's leading trade companies, the American Gaming Association, is now pressing legislators to examine sweepstakes operators and, in many cases, enact new legislation on the problem.

'Consumers are being deprived of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and earnings chances as this gaming replaces that carried out through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And then there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social gambling establishments in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes casino operators paid a combined $14.2 million in 4 different cases in Kentucky without confessing any wrongdoing, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW accepted pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, stating the settlement was made to avoid legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a handle the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most current lawsuit, which is mostly comparable to its predecessors, New york city state residents Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'illegal gambling enterprise. '

Apple and Google have actually likewise been named as accuseds in lawsuits for hosting the sweepstakes websites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business reacted to DailyMail.com's demand for comment.

'We generally do not talk about matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson informed DailyMail.com via email. 'However, we keep in mind that this claim has only just been filed with the court and VGW has actually not been formally served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and regulations where we operate, and remain positive about the future,' the representative continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play games throughout most of North America, as we have for more than a decade, creating not only terrific video games, user experiences and home entertainment, but likewise ensuring this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of requirements.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively typical across the online social video games market (and the US more broadly), and our basic practice is that we plan to intensely safeguard any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The concerns between traditional online sports betting and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show troublesome for some celebrity endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both back VGW's Global Poker brand name while the NBA is partnered with standard video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's ironic that expert athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting wagering 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues wish to forecast a strong stance against unlawful gaming - particularly when attempting to tamp down the periodic gaming scandal,' Glaser informed DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter received a life time restriction from the NBA over accusations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything including social or sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Along with VGW, Apple and Google are being demanded hosting presumably illegal gambling sites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant problem for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes backing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser included.

Neither an NBA spokesman nor the gamers' representatives responded to DailyMail.com's requests for comment. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps likewise ignored to react to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their celebrity endorsers have an obligation to describe to customers the differences and resemblances in between iGaming and sweepstakes casinos, VGW firmly insisted there is nothing more that needs to be done.

'We have full confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our business practices more broadly,' the representative stated. 'Some of our values are" our players come first" and" we do what's right", and we put our worths at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken challenger of sweepstakes websites, sees things differently.

'Celebrities who provide their names to shady prohibited sports betting websites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at danger in addition to courting civil and class actions by consumers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is likewise some risk that state regulators and state chief law officers rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for helping with unlawful gambling.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton